Live Help
Want to know more
Enter the details and we'll call you soon

Name :

Company Name :

City :

Mobile No. :

Email id :

  

Thank you for your details



Our Executive will reach you shortly.

Your Session Will Expire in   seconds.
If you do not wish to log-out, choose 'Let me continue'
Reset SessionCancel Session
 

Order to freeze respondent’s Bank account couldn’t’ be passed without direction u/s 132(3) of 1961 Act

July 23, 2020[2020] 117 taxmann.com 795 (Karnataka)
77 Views

FEMA, BANKING & INSURANCE : Where investigating officer in exercise of power under section 37(3) directed a bank that respondent should not be allowed to operate his bank account as said account was suspected to be involved in a case under Act, in view of fact that an order under section 132(3) of 1961 Act putting a restraint on operation of account of respondent was not at all passed, impugned direction was to be quashed

read more

taxmann.com
Payment
Best view in 1140 x 768